Poster Session 4: Day 3 - Thu 25 Sep, 10.30 am to 11.00 am |
POSTER ID | TITLE | PRESENTING AUTHOR |
P110 | Exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in studies of patients with rare diseases: a systematic survey of the literature | Sohail Mulla |
P111 | Description of the protocols of randomized controlled trials on cancer drugs conducted in Spain (1999-2003) | Gerard Urrútia |
P112 | Extent of missing outcome data for participants in trials included in five Cochrane systematic reviews: a descriptive analysis | Lara Kahale |
P113 | Methodological quality of negative versus positive studies | Jaykaran Charan |
P114 | Evaluating abstracts to predict low risk-of-bias RCTs using a natural language processing approach | Erika Ota |
P115 | Sex and gender issues in research and publishing: implications for Cochrane Reviews | Sera Tort |
P116 | The processing of Cochrane Open Access | David Hives |
P117 | Assessment of methodological quality of adaptive clinical trials | Branko Miladinovic |
P118 | The risk of unblinding was infrequently and incompletely reported in 300 randomised clinical trial publications | Segun Bello |
P121 | Handling trial participants with missing dichotomous outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a methodological survey of proposed approaches | Lara Kahale |
P122 | An empirical investigation of clinical trialists' views regarding methods to conceal allocation | Sohail Mulla |
P124 | The impact of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist on reporting of randomized clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine | Xin Zhang |
P125 | Trial investigators as authors of Cochrane reviews: do we manage conflicts of interests adequately? | Paul Garner |
P126 | The development of a quality assessment checklist for molecular marker studies | Inge Stegeman |
P127 | Adherence to reporting guidelines in biomedical journals of Latin America | Demian Glujovsky |
P128 | Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews | Julie Bolvig Hansen |
P129 | Randomised clinical trials on acupuncture in the Korean literature: bibliometric analysis and methodological quality | Byung-Cheul Shin |
P130 | Replication and contradiction of highly cited research papers in psychiatry: 10-year follow-up | Aran Tajika |
P131 | How do systematic reviews incorporate assessment of study quality into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study | Srinivasa Katikireddi |
P132 | Investigating wish bias and mediating role of drug dose in Cochrane systematic reviews: the case-example of fluoxetine | Marianna Purgato |
p133 | Systematic review of prediction models in obstetrics: model development and clinical applicability | Karel Moons |
P134 | Assessment of reporting quality in infertility journals | Demian Glujovsky |
P135 | Dissemination of randomized controlled trials in oncology during 1999-2003 in Spain | Gerard Urrútia |
P136 | The risk-of-bias profile of neonatal randomised-controlled trials in Cochrane reviews: are we better over the years? | Nai Ming Lai |
P138 | Quality assessment in studies of all non-randomised designs: example from a Cochrane Review of surgery for epilepsy | Sarah Nolan |
P139 | Observer bias in the laboratory: a challenge to translational medicine. Systematic review of animal model experiments | Segun Bello |
P140 | Publication bias in post-graduate medical education dissertations in India | Ambuj Kumar |
P141 | Reporting missing outcome data for participants in randomized trials: a methodological survey of proposed approaches | Elie Akl |